About Me

Sarah BrodwallI'm a 31 year old American expat living in Oslo, Norway, with my bulldog, Ada, and my husband, Johannes. My interests include interaction design, especially information architecture, philosophy of mind and ethics, cognitive psychology, sociobiology, feminism, yoga, fat acceptance, knitting, pottery, and cooking.

Recent Activity

Comments

Censorship on the internet « Pensées aléatoires on Norway is filtering the internet?: […] There are various countries who are testing out such filtering software, one of them…
Sarah Brodwall on Fat in Norway vs. Fat in the US: It did make it through moderation. :) It wasn’t terribly well-received (there was…
Too Much Information | Today Headlines on Fat in Norway vs. Fat in the US: […] Meowzer had an interesting post today about how fat Americans are vs. what people…
Too Much Information | Today Headlines on Fat in Norway vs. Fat in the US: […] Meowzer had an interesting post today about how fat Americans are vs. what people…
tara on Fat in Norway vs. Fat in the US: Sadly your post probably won’t make it through moderation. Fat Acceptance blogs have no…

1 June 2006

Ooooh, so sad!

- Testet ikke drikken på lam - Aftenposten.no

Especially after all the lamby goodness from the other day.

Just to translate quickly, a new drink for lambs (”Lammedrikk Pluss”, or “The Lamb Drink Plus”) was put out on the market recently by Tine, the company who also produces most of Norway’s dairy products. The lamb drink wasn’t thoroughly tested since the demand for it was so high–they only tested it out on baby goats and not lambs. It turned out to kill the poor lambs! They got so full of gas their bellies blew up like balloons, and it took them a long time to die. It’s been taken off the market, and the producer is compensating the farmers with 350,- NOK, about 60 USD, for each lamb that died from imbibing this product.

Such a sad little piece of news. Poor lambs. This is not good press for Tine.

Posted at 8:51
639 Views - No Comments

Consumer vs. Citizen

At least one of my readers here knows about my discomfiture at my husband Johannes’s decision to “boycott” the US since the US-VISIT program went into effect. Half Changed World linked today to a really good post on Decomposition. The author the the post manages to concisely state a lot of the ideas I’ve had running around in my head about Johannes’s kind of “activism”.

Does a company do something you don’t like? Go ahead and boycott, but don’t bother organizing or informing the public or even taking the five minutes to write the company and tell them why you’re boycotting. In effect, of course, you’ve completely disempowered yourself, because the company will have no idea why you’re not buying their goods and is just as likely to determine that it’s because their ads don’t feature enough young naked women. All of the effective boycotts in history have been large, well-organized and public. Boycotting a store or product by itself may be an important expression of our personal values, but it will not effect social or political change.

These statements are relevant to a lot of what we call “activism” today. I’m guilty of this kind of laziness, too.

It’s a little too early for me to be posting now; I hope to post a more well-thought out discussion of my thoughts on this subject. For now, though, thanks to Athena Dreaming for this bit of inspiration.

Posted at 7:51
591 Views - No Comments